![]() In a separate 13-page filing Friday, the Justice Department reiterated its case for redacting parts of the affidavit, including “to protect the safety and privacy of a significant number of civilian witnesses in addition to law enforcement.” The Justice Department asked in the letter that the room where the documents were stored "be secured and that all of the boxes that were moved from the White House to Mar-a-Lago (along with any other items in that room) be preserved in that room in their current condition until further notice." ![]() ![]() In June, Justice Department lawyers sent Trump's attorneys a letter that reiterated that Mar-a-Lago couldn't be used to store classified information, according to the affidavit. The affidavit noted that based on the federal investigation, the government believed that the storage room where boxes of presidential records were kept at Mar-a-Lago, as well as Trump's suite, his office and other spaces "within the premises are not currently authorized locations for the storage of classified information." Pages from the affidavit by the FBI in support of obtaining a search warrant for former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate. The document itself says that any “premature disclosure” of the affidavit and other related documents could "have a significant and negative impact on the continuing investigation and may severely jeopardize its effectiveness by allowing criminal parties an opportunity to flee, destroy evidence (stored electronically and otherwise), change patterns of behavior, and notify criminal confederates.” The Justice Department had argued against releasing the affidavit. There were also papers described as “SCI” documents, which stands for highly classified “sensitive compartmented information.” 8 search, according to the property receipt of items that were recovered. To re-redact the individual, simply repeat this process and re-tick the tick box.Ultimately, FBI agents removed 11 additional sets of classified documents, including some labeled secret and top secret, during the Aug. This means that the individual will be visible and not blurred. Once you have found the right track, simply untick the tickbox to un-redact the specific individual. ![]() This is also the case when you double click on a track to open the track’s individual track view. You’ll notice that each track has a little tick box in the top left hand corner of each track’s thumbnail. To find the individual’s corresponding track, scroll through the Tracks panel using the Tracks panel scrolling arrows and/or page flick through options. ![]() A track is a consecutive set of redaction boxes that follows their face throughout the video, so that they can be blurred. Their track is represented by their thumbnail in the Tracks panel on the right. With this function, you can quickly un-redact someone for one version of your redacted video, and then re-redact them for another version of your video - for whatever reason, and for whatever level of security access.įor example, if you are fulfilling a DSAR and are redacting body worn camera footage from a police camera, you may wish to un-blur the face of the person who made the request, and then create a similar version where only the suspect is visible.ĭon’t worry, Secure Redact makes this quick and simple.įirst, you need to find the individual’s corresponding track in the Tracks panel. If you need to quickly un-blur an individual from a video, then this functionality is for you. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |